InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 275
Posts 32730
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2013

Re: Doc logic post# 180292

Friday, 06/29/2018 11:05:57 PM

Friday, June 29, 2018 11:05:57 PM

Post# of 704596
Personally Doc, I'm reserving judgment. We don't know what/when management knew many things. It could be they should have simply conducted IAs like everyone else and publicly announced the recommendations. This may or may not have allowed everyone to gauge their personal risk more. Many small pharma do quite well with that unless their therapy fails in the end. If it fails, they get pummeled. What NWBO did was provide, to this day mind you, the sense that their therapy can be frontline for GBM based upon this trial. We simply don't know if they are saying that out of knowledge, ignorance or something else. I reserve judgment on their unorthodox approach, because I am aware there may be far more than meets the eye. Still under more normal circumstances, publicly announced IAs tend to allow the public to gauge their risk in a reasonable time based way markets grasp and reluctantly respect. That may or may not have been possible here. Believe it or not, the SEC abhors mirage timelines when they are not founded on reasonable grounds, imo. The forward looking statement joke isn't funny to me. Sorry.

Respect Risk. Conduct Your Own Due Diligence. Manage your assets wisely. Diversify.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News