InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 4660
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/25/2006

Re: None

Friday, 06/29/2018 8:56:14 AM

Friday, June 29, 2018 8:56:14 AM

Post# of 232826
Replace Hauck ! Hold on now. Just one second. Why would anyone want to replace someone they never had?

Now look here. You can put a cabbage patch doll there. The doll may not get much accomplished, but maybe over a million parents and children will be happy.

Was it political, poor performance, a warning to others, who knows.

But where is the need to replace someone that you never had. It’s not like LQMT had increased sales YOY, and they are off this year. I do not see this as having a negative impact on the stock or LQMT. Who they get to replace Paul, will have more of an impact as some have posted. PH may not have been able to seal the deal quick enough, or paid enough attention to shareholders concerns, but he did have knowledge of MIM and
amorphous metal process.

His knowledge in Amorphous Metal ran it’s course with LQMT. The world of new materials is always evolving. Take a look at super graphene, it is now considered the strongest material in the world and it is where LM was 50 years ago.

No matter who LQMT hires. I get the feeling that the success of LQMT, rests with those outside the company seeing a need for LM’s qualities, (like Apple, Swatch etc.,) rather than the present executives inside the company, trying to sell their technology.

IMHO, LQMT always lacked a solid marketing expert who could better introduce the product to new clients. You can’t replace what you never had. But, you can hire someone new who just might be able to seal the deal this year.

Good luck to all.
LQMT.30+ late July.




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News