InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 142
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: KevGee59 post# 131804

Friday, 06/29/2018 5:40:46 AM

Friday, June 29, 2018 5:40:46 AM

Post# of 430312
K-

if the trials they compared did have 1st and 2nd AIs, I would guess 7 months would be appropriate. End of Sept...

It the trials they compared didn't have 1st and 2nd, then I would say 5 months seems logical.

Why? I see it as the opposite:
A.) It the trials they compared didn't have 1st and 2nd, then I would say 7 months seems logical.
B.) If the trials they compared did have 1st and 2nd AIs, I would guess 5 months would be appropriate. End of July …

e.g. (for R-IT … A.) for the example)
A.) app. 52k data (44k acc. to the protocol + 8k final) site visits) should be checked / scrubbed at final
B.) app. 16k data (8k since 2nd IA acc. to the protocol + 8k final site visits) should be checked / scrubbed at final

B.) should be faster … majority of the data were locked at 2nd IA.

Best,
G



#NEWMIAMI

Disclosure:
I am long with this stock. I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Do Your Job

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News