A little on the low end as far as time goes IMO, but you may be right? To place a new material in Batteries for instance, there are contracts with other firms to be fulfilled for one! Then, the Old material suppliers might bargain their charges way down to stop the competitive Company!
But since we would supply CHS in the Nano level, much less product is needed to produce even better results, as that has been the case with Nano Graphene! Less means more doesn't make sense, but strange things go on in the single filament Nano level! I don't know if that holds true with all Nano materials, but chances are that less product will be needed to at least produce comparable results to the Lithium Ion product!
Then, Companies are beginning to feel the distrust of Lithium as the base material for the EV Battery! We just have to make certain our CHS material is safer, and then more productive at the same time! Remember, with the CHS material, it will translate into smaller batteries I would think, which mean re-engineering all the way around! Smaller casings, different materials synergistic with the CHS product, which means a long delay in the EV manufacturing! First comes the new battery, then maybe the whole chassis has to be changed just because of an addition of just one new CHS substance! But maybe that can be worked out with a minimum of transformations?
Maybe it will be simpler in the end, making the change to CHS even more palatable! Maybe again, Tesla will be one of the first to introduce the CHS material, for the weight and the price for their models are way out of line, maybe even too cumbersome in the practical sense?
Then the large weight of the Batteries in the Tesla models maybe placing too much load on the Batteries themselves, causing the fires we are seeing today! Then to control the Electron transfer from all the batteries at the same time may be an inherent danger to Tesla's models! A huge transfer of energy may not be suitable for the transfer wiring between all the Batteries, for super-strong wiring materials are needed!
Yes, the Tesla seems to work, but like in the Old Boeing 707, many new troublesome situations arose as time went on! It is almost predictable that if the technology remains the same with tesla, the wearing-out factor will decrease from maybe 5 years to maybe 3 years, who knows? I would not trust the Tesla on the road for long hauls, as I envision it right now! IMO only, as I am no Electrical engineer, just another person trying to bring in a few possibilities!
But is CRTG can make the whole EV engineering process simpler, there is no doubt that it would be a plus for EV manufacturers! I don't know for sure if the CHS product will make things simpler in the end, but it surely should make the battery smaller and maybe less complex, not sure though!
