UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[DreamGreen]

CHANBOND/UOIP response out Today! Our lawyers continue to impress. This is exactly what I wanted to see.

In order for the Arris petitions to be time barred (a good thing for us) they need to show privity. Which means Chanbond must prove that Arris could have control over the defendants litigation. I believe the info below is what Chanbond's lawyers were fighting to get in discovery. This part of Arris indemnification document clearly states they have control. Even more so now I think the Arris petitions will be denied.

22. INDEMNIFICATION. ARRIS will defend and hold Customer …
harmless against damages finally awarded … and will, at ARRIS’
expense, defend any third party claim, suit, or proceeding (“Claim”)
brought against Customer insofar as such Claim is based on an
allegation that a Product as provided to Customer directly infringes a
valid patent or copyright. ARRIS will pay Damages as the result of
the Claim provided that (i) Customer promptly notifies ARRIS of the
Claim, (ii) Customer gives ARRIS all applicable evidence in
Customer’s possession, custody or control, and (iii) Customer gives
ARRIS reasonable assistance in and sole control of the defense and all
negotiations for its settlement or compromise.

https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ptab-filings%2FIPR2018-00570%2F17