InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: Detroit 77 post# 15304

Thursday, 10/19/2006 1:37:08 PM

Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:37:08 PM

Post# of 45771
Detroit77, if this world class patent attorney that you are referring to chooses not to express his or her opinion I would suspect that it's because the qusetion is so obvious that it doesn't warrant an answer, or the question may be too specific to the ASD/CDEx settlement and it's a matter of professional ethics.

Just my guess.

But from a layman's view, I would tend to agree with Wasp, If for whatever reason, CDEX stops royalty payments but continues to sell Valimed, ASD can once again sue for infringement. And of course, CDEX can counter sue for patent invalidity.

Although on second thought, I'm not sure how the "with prejudice" fits into the above picture. Maybe the law suit would be for breach of contract. Don't know.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.