Amfil Technologies Inc (FUNN)

[Felo31]

I agree with you that communications regarding the audits have been HORRIBLE. No one can defend them. At the same time there are some instances where we can give the benefit of the doubt.

In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intention of stating incorrect information in order to mislead the other person.

The question that has been raised throughout the entire process, and the defense that Roger has consistently stated is that he has been relaying the information from the auditors back to us.

If you believe “statement A” to be the truth and you relay that statement forward, you are not lying. If “statement A” is proven to be false that does not make your previous communications to be lies, it just proves them to be false.

If, you know that “statement A” is false and you continue to repeat “statement A” as truth KNOWING that it is false, THEN you are lying.

The problem with this is , of course, that for the person who is hearing the message will have a great deal of trouble to make this analysis. This is not something that is obviously seen, as it is far easier to discover the falsehood of a statement before one discovers the INTENT behind the statement.