billionaire row
Unified Online requested the CB Capital report in question for objective evaluation of its interest in
purchasing ChanBond and monetizing the patents through litigation.1 This is exactly the type of
task a relatively small company like Unified Online may need to have performed by independent
contractors or consultants. See e.g., Robocast Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 10–1055
(RGA), 2013 WL 12147601 at *4 (D. Del. July 19, 2013) (adopted in full by Aug. 17, 2013 oral
order). Despite Defendants’ statements to the contrary, the report was never used as a “sword” in
this litigation or elsewhere. To the contrary, CB Capital’s report was not publicly disclosed, nor
was it disclosed to Unified Online’s shareholders.2 CB Capital’s report was produced in this
litigation under the highest level of confidentiality. CB Capital is not ChanBond’s testifying
damages expert, is not affiliated in any way with ChanBond’s testifying expert, and ChanBond does
not anticipate calling anyone from CB Capital at trial.3
Penny Stock Analyst, not licensed, but may as well be...
