InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mickeybritt]

olddog

First no one is arguing the obvious the Patent act is uncsonstitutional
at it would require a constitutional amendment. Second you give or award
someone something and later retake it that is confiscating what you
had been given since you didn't willingly turn it back over.

But you can't get around it being your papers covered by the 4th amendment
as it isn't the patent offices papers it is yours something that is covered
by the 4th amendment, The government is ultimately be found guilty of
violating the constitution. The 1st amendment stops this crap and they
have no right to pass any law that takes away our constitutional rights.
It would be called a amendment explaining what the amendment was doing
in detail and there is no amendment saying patent owner's rights are
not covered but rather the constitution encourages progress and patents
be protected for 20 years.

JMO
Mickey