defendants have until May 17 to reply to Chanbonds reasons for no stay. he will decide very shortly after. defendants know they can't argue for a stay successfully. a stay would be tactial by the defendants and prejudice the plaintiffs with discovery done June 1st.
this is the reason why, earlier this week when the judge denied privileged valuation information to defendants, the defendants the next day sent the judge a sealed plea, and the next day which was Wednesday he said yes he will allow them to see privileged valuation information.
its counting the $ at this point....the 13 MSO's rolled out tech to increase networking speeds while willfully ignoring Chanbond's request to evaluate their patents. they thought it best to deal with it in the future. now is that time.
Penny Stock Analyst, not licensed, but may as well be...
