Friday, May 11, 2018 10:54:31 AM
to me this is not in our favor... correct me if I'm wrong.
Our judges "in order to vacate" must first decide they want to look at the case as "de novo" AND then find/discovery of "real party of interest" like ptab should have, then decide on the time bar issue, then decide on the patentability issue with lost claims? Or does the discovery and time bar issue supersede the rest if the decide to just deem ATVI as RPI? Sounds pretty layered and makes me think remand... unless I'm confused, that final written decision from westernGeco does not help us.
even though the cases seem pretty different who thinks otherwise? Anyone else have better explanation... or opinion on what path our judges may take/ possible scenarios?
Recent WDDD News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 08:47:52 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 12:00:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:34:14 PM
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM