![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, May 11, 2018 10:54:31 AM
to me this is not in our favor... correct me if I'm wrong.
Our judges "in order to vacate" must first decide they want to look at the case as "de novo" AND then find/discovery of "real party of interest" like ptab should have, then decide on the time bar issue, then decide on the patentability issue with lost claims? Or does the discovery and time bar issue supersede the rest if the decide to just deem ATVI as RPI? Sounds pretty layered and makes me think remand... unless I'm confused, that final written decision from westernGeco does not help us.
even though the cases seem pretty different who thinks otherwise? Anyone else have better explanation... or opinion on what path our judges may take/ possible scenarios?
Recent WDDD News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 08:47:52 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 12:00:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/11/2023 06:34:14 PM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM