UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[VortMax]

I'm reading up on arris' ipr's they did on 2.2.18. I did not know they did file. No way they will win. They argue that the device knows where to send the signals within a channel for bonding purposes based on a unit-location database. Based on the broadest reasonable interpretation of a unit-location database, there is no way they can come to the Chanbond patent of CDMA on channel bonding, which is the tech at use today. That tech is the ability of several transmitters to send data over a single channel, and then to bond the appropriate transmission at the receiver with its representative date on another channel.

Arris basically says you transmit and a database tells the data where to go which is not CDMA technology. CDMA tech specifically is for codes attached to the transmission in order to avoid interference of multiple transmissions on a single channel.

Arris is like 50 cars on the highway that have predetermined places to go, and if another car is in the way it'll smash right through it. Chanbond is 50 cars on the same highway, but programmed to move around each other to avoid collision as they go to their destination, which is what makes the technology actually work.

You can't do what Cisco or Arris propose and get to the technology at use.

https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/caselist?petitioners=Arris+International+PLC