InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,482.87
(
0.09%
)
US TECH 100
19,264.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,164.06
(
0.09%
)
Brent Oil
85.68
(
0.30%
)
Bitcoin
61,408.72
(
-0.33%
)
Post# of 96905
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

zombywolf

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 191
Posts 14523
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

zombywolf

Re: VortMax post# 41798

Monday, 04/30/2018 9:24:13 PM

Monday, April 30, 2018 9:24:13 PM

Post# of 96905
You only need 1 patent infringed to win. You dont win 3x as much with 3 patents infringed. The only reason, IMO, to appeal those claims they lost, is that patent applies more to Cisco than the other patents do. If you have to appeal, its better to do it up front, than after a loss at trial and then going to the CAFC. More I think about it, while we are waiting for the Cable 13 trial in December, why not clean up the loose ends, in case they have to deal with Cisco down the road. Yes, patents are either all good or invalid, no middle ground.

All information provided is the opinion of this poster from review of information in the public domain.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up