InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: Suvorov post# 163830

Tuesday, 04/24/2018 10:35:41 AM

Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:35:41 AM

Post# of 165851
The lithium deal would not have put 10m in the ground.
It would have put 10m in Scotts hands.

If that 10m would produce all you claim then Scott should be answering to your complaints.

He spent FAR over 10m and got nothing but a few holes and a CTO.

That 10m would have been use to pay management fees and "services"
Just like the last 10m.

The PPS would defiantly skyrocketed. And that would allow Currah and crew to dump millions of shares and crash the price yet again.

Before you praise Scott for what "could have been" you might want to explain Scotts string of failures and how he could not succeed in even the smallest of challenges.

How are we supposed to believe Scott could produce anything with 10m when he couldn't even do something as simple as fully reporting when he had millions more than that?