InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 6479
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2017

Re: Bored Lawyer post# 167220

Friday, 04/13/2018 1:49:47 PM

Friday, April 13, 2018 1:49:47 PM

Post# of 701951
If Dr Cobbss states that there is a "fat long tail of 20% OS or more" in year 5, then to me that is yet another sign that they have beaten present SOC by at least x4 (SOC is 5% OS in year 5).

So Im not sure, do you mean you believe that if they had this fat long tail they would have already made it public for economic motives?
There has been so much discussion on this board about this.
I am not a LP fan, but I do believe she meant when she said that she wanted to have an additional home run. Also, I dont think that Cobbs, Liau Linda and Bosch are lying when they talk about a fat OS.

That they have not made top line public yet is completely beyond my and your understanding. Now I think that NWBO has put itself in yet another impossible Houdini act. Its my belief they cannot or really do not present top line results before the publication of the blinded data. Therefore they must wait for publication which they have little control over before they really can go forward and release top line. How dumb is that? So if we do not see a publication before the UCLA congress, then they will cancel ASCO yet again, waiting for the blinded publication. Ironi is, IMO, that NWBO is then waiting for blinded publication with the unblinded top line result ready to be made known. JMHO



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News