Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

Normally I would not debate the FDA-free enterprise bit and the whole point you make for the processes we rely on. However, I have been really struggling with the pace or this CNS (including AD) work(clinical results /IND/PII trails and the overall effectiveness of the previous/current FDA scientific problem solving processes. Particularly the past 20 years of AD trails and what has come from them...nothing of any value. How many times do you need to prove what is NOT the cause? I do not accept that outcome, having myself sat in many technical problem solving, goals driven complex technical process discussions. This process is broken, they produce solutions w/serious side effects and then will accept adding caution comments/labeling. But, keep products on market saying more good than harm is being done? That is just sloppy processing and sloppy engineering. Such outcomes must not be tolerated. These kinds of failures start at the top including top FDA management. We have been paying for a process that is broken and which would have failed in free enterprise if used by a commercial firm.

This from a previous post. The video is shocking and will help put some pieces in place. I do not believe all of this, however some arguments are powerful. I think we are at least obligated to keep an open mind on such points.

This link originally provided by Investor 2014 helps provide additional context. As Schewart said, "Information w/o context is worthless" .The video is > 1hr. Advise you watch in segments NTE 15 mins. It is powerful stuff.