InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 151
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/18/2015

Re: None

Wednesday, 04/11/2018 2:47:58 AM

Wednesday, April 11, 2018 2:47:58 AM

Post# of 6377
While I’m on my soap box I need to reply to Barbedwire! Actually, there is no evidence that DNAbilize works on any cancer or other diseases than AML and apparently since BPTH is returning to the 90 mg dose that is yet to be proven by clinicals. Your assertion of other cancers and diseases must be proven by clinical studies! Basically, it appears we are still in a vacuum there! You talk about revenue streams? I wish Peter could generate just one revenue stream, in the near future, but he seems incapable of that! Revenue is just streaming one direction, into Peter’s pocket! As far as naked shorts, I’m pretty much certain that naked shorting is not the problem here and those shorts are covered, if you understand how shorting is handled by the brokerage firms. Our brokerage stock may be used for covering shorts and we don’t even know it. The crap here is that Peter has put us in a position where it is more lucrative to short BPTH than it is to own it! We are seeing a remarkable case study of the Peter Principle in action!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BPTH News