InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 234
Posts 26887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2013

Re: ppnlf post# 125417

Thursday, 04/05/2018 5:19:37 PM

Thursday, April 05, 2018 5:19:37 PM

Post# of 426875
Legal filing today that is not posted, happened 14:40 4-5-2018. If the legal decision triggered some business action....? It's not that odd to get CTO, but odd as hell to not have the docket update with # filing from whom ever...

For example the next filing would be labeled as #91 from bla bla; instead it's only known a filing occurred at 14:40 from someone.

04/02/2018 89 REPLY BRIEF FILED for Appellants Amarin Pharma, Inc. and Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd. [87]. Number of Pages: 37. Service: 04/02/2018 by email. The paper copies of the brief should be received by the court on or before 04/11/2018. Appendix is due 04/09/2018. [510555] [CMT] [Entered: 04/04/2018 12:50 PM]
04/02/2018 90 6 paper copies of the Corrected Amicus Brief [82] received from Amici Curiae Council for Responsible Nutrition and Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3S. [510961] [SJL] [Entered: 04/05/2018 02:40 PM]
04/03/2018 88 Entry of appearance for Thomas King-Sun Fu as of counsel for Intervenors DSM Marine Lipids Peru S.A.C., DSM Nutritional Products Canada, Inc., DSM Nutritional Products LLC, Pharmavite LLC and Royal DSM NV. Service: 04/03/2018 by email. [510396] [18-1247] [Thomas Fu] [Entered: 04/03/2018 05:27 PM]



Purely speculating the filing could be from Solicitor General or Judge and it triggered CTO. Amarin would be obligated to release 8-K, unless SG/Judge Order led to BO offer or other business arrangement. An Amarin suitor could be behind the entire ITC scheme and have offer based on X results.


BB

Mr. McGee, don't make me angry. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry---David Banner

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News