InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 533
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/22/2017

Re: Eicheljager post# 146162

Friday, 03/30/2018 11:44:59 AM

Friday, March 30, 2018 11:44:59 AM

Post# of 233577
It's not just this one blog post you quote that necessarily guarentees revenue producing contracts at the end of 90 days. To fully understand why everyone here is holding Hauck to this 90 day "promise" is an accumulation of all the statements in the many Q's and on the past website posts clear back to the days of the Steipp hire. It's all the talk of hundreds of RFQ's and "any day now" over more than 4 years of absolutely not one signed contract that even pays for a 4th of this salary. That is the "promise" everyone is hold his feet to the fire for the 90 days this is Paul Hauck's absolute last change he has until the end of next week to get a contract for real revenue that at least pays his salary. He should be fired if he doesn't - in no other company would be allowed to keep your job as head of sales if nothing was sold in over 4 years - name one!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News