InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1113
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2014

Re: A deleted message

Tuesday, 03/20/2018 10:45:21 PM

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:45:21 PM

Post# of 232551
I think that LQMT was the one to do the screwing.

At the onset there were all kinds of negotiations and contracts with Materion. In addition to providing those magic little cylinders, Materion was going to promote and showcase. Materion did prominently display on their website the addition of LQMT. They did attend the big Engle sales symposium in Germany as a partner. They did train their sales people and give them cursory knowledge of BMG.

It's LQMT that didn't uphold their end of the bargain. It's LQMT that only bought enough material to make 200 pocketknives, 1,000 bridge pins, and what ever LQMT engineering has used for experiments over the past 3 years. I think Materion is understandably pissed.

It's LQMT that desired this channel and then did not sell anything. I'm sure an ingot of LM105 from Materion is expensive but it obviously must be exponentially expensive once LQMT management adds the cost of their overhead let alone the actual production costs. That's why Liquidmetal has never taken off! That's why you have not made any money on you LQMT investment; it is outrageously priced.


It has always been my premise that once Hong Kong Liquidmetal bought the company, the LM 105 recipe was what they were really after. That recipe was loaded in a briefcase and made a direct flight to China and will never been seen again. In that briefcase were every LQMT iHub followers dreams. Now that LM105 can be freely exploited by Eontec, I don't think we shareholders will see a dime.