InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 4355
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2017

Re: BrokeAgent post# 39714

Monday, 03/12/2018 3:50:39 PM

Monday, March 12, 2018 3:50:39 PM

Post# of 96905
That's what I was referring to, however I was very vague. Cisco would be liable if the cisco 13 lost this case and paid damages to UOIP. The cisco 13 would target Cisco for selling them products that they did not hold patents on. And being the damages paid will be on knowingly infringed basis it will be very very hefty. I mean we all know anything can happen in court. But lets be honest this is a very strong case we have here. Anyone who has read and followed the trail of information and court documents knows how strong this case is. There is risk in any investment. But the sheer size of financial gains that are possible here outweigh any risk in my opinion. $1000 dollars invested at these levels could net you $10s of thousands very easily and could potentially be $100k+ in very favorable situations. More then likely this won't make it to court because as the date gets closer, Cisco will realize its time to fork out the cash and buy the patent to continue business with their customers (Cisco 13) and continue charging for the technology going forward. Otherwise they lose out on a very important income stream and will be liable for potentially over a billion dollars anyways. As i've stated in many prior posts, the reason this trades so low is because there is very very low buyer awareness. We all got here because we saw it on the break out board the couple times it was there and read up on the board and looked into the case. Cisco and all the media will never cover this because its a bad rap for them and their shareholders, and UOIP could care less if anyone shares in their spoils of court war.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.