InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 137
Posts 41656
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 01/05/2004

Re: I-Glow post# 132523

Thursday, 03/08/2018 2:31:15 PM

Thursday, March 08, 2018 2:31:15 PM

Post# of 203913
The real truth is,...

Friedland supplied the opinion letter that was given to OWC.

Your post leaves out the other information that totally spells out that OWC is clear of any wrongdoing.

"OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

the rest of the facts,..

45. In order to sell his restricted shares in the public marketplace, Friedland needed to have OWC’s transfer agent remove the restricted legend on Global’s 5,134,375 shares.

46. Friedland provided the transfer agent with a purported attorney opinion letter that included inaccurate information about Global’s acquisition of OWC stock and misleading information about the connection between Friedland, Global, and Lane 6552. The letter was
signed by a disbarred attorney.


It was Friedland that hired the disbarred attorney.

Nothing, no criminal actions to do with OWC.



invest at your own risk, based on your own due diligence, at your own risk tolerance