InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 2302
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/19/2017

Re: A deleted message

Wednesday, 03/07/2018 3:02:42 PM

Wednesday, March 07, 2018 3:02:42 PM

Post# of 96905
Longer goes, more likely Egregious Misconduct

Egregious Misconduct

v 1. whether the infringer deliberately copied the ideas or design of another;
v 2. whether the infringer, when he knew of the other's patent protection, investigated the scope of the patent and formed a good-faith belief that it was invalid or that it was not infringed;
v 3. the infringer's behavior as a party to the litigation;
v 4. defendant's size and financial condition;
v 5. closeness of the case;
v 6. duration of defendant's misconduct;
v 7. remedial action by the defendant;
v 8. defendant's motivation for harm;
v 9. attempt to conceal misconduct.

Scruffer <> IP patent attorney but portrays one during bouts of psychosis on this MB.

Scruffer = Believes this could be one of the largest intellectual property judgments if no settlement reached.

Soon, "No where else to run"; "Don't put us on the back burner"; "Gotta help us out".

But, once again, corruption DOES exist!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.