DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[ann441j]

Froggy:
Oh, oh...a "Dear Ann" letter...

I went to an extreme in providing info from the 1st newsletter of DNAP co. news, not because I am unaware of past or current events or what DNAP's organization prospects have enolved into to the betterment of it's pipelines throughout the past six years, but, to simply point out a couple of very profound statements quoted by Tony regarding SNPS, because "that is what is currently under discussion." It is unaccesary for your casting me as naive or somewhat underachieved. Also, not neccasary for your kid-gloved approach of your rebuttal towards me.

Throughout these several patient years for us who have stuck it through, I have read and re-read your analyzations of investor exchanges vs. your negative slants and views, day in and day out with whichever poster you wished to duel - slaps in the face with your semi-glistening off-white glove and your never-ending "touches." Your psyche, bottom line: "You simply HAVE to have the last word!!"

Hence, I KNOW if my reply to you now isn't geared to your specifics and expectations, (confused yet?) I presume I will get a long dissertation post-provided. You may not want to waste your time, though. Sorry to dissapoint you, my friend, but, I AM totally aware of what goals DNAP is endeavoring, working towards, whether it ever is realized or not, all the way through the possibilities of not making it through all of the legal or financial burdens, etc. and etc. so, specifically, I will continue to judge what I post regarding potential investor-related DD., whether it passes your inspection or not.

We have a choice, Froggy. We can both be gazing at a similar object - I choose to look at most things with a positive outlook and approach, simply because that's how I wish to conduct my life............and.........you...........?

I do, however, may I add, Froggie, appreciate your somewhat catious demeanor towards me. What did I do to deserve that? - lol

Take care,
Ann