Andiamo Corp. (ANDI)

[stervc]

TripleZero, Important, with these ANDI thoughts...

I am going to explain how ANDI was part of helping investors to turn $200 to $200,000 through a process that I have been exercising or years. This process alone would help to answer the thoughts of which you have referred. I will explain this process at the end of this post because I think there is much more clarity that need to be first discussed. The post will be titles… Exit Strategy & Etiquette Thoughts for a Stock

Let’s discuss…

Respectfully, I was not the one who assumed that ANDI was going to be generating $100 Million in revenues... the company did.

Respectfully... Who are we to tell them what they have and/or don't have? I'll answer that for you... Nobody!

Respectfully, I disagree with your thoughts. I don’t think “assuming” they will reach their forecasted goal of $100 Million, without giving a date, is far-fetched. Let me further explain.

The #1 reason why we all buy a stock is because of... potential. When I say "potential" I am referring to a stock's potential for growth. The reason being is because you can find yourself buying a major market stock that might be either trapped into the Laws of Diminishing Returns or subjected to such in the near term.

There are lots of major market stocks to compare as proof to use as good examples. Take MSFT (Microsoft), QCOM (Qualcomm), and CSCO (Cisco) to "compare and contrast" as some good examples. Please, don't just believe me. Go back and look at the 52 week lows for MSFT, QCOM, and CSCO and then go back and look at the .0001 per share price for the 52 week low for ANDI. Now go back and compare the 52 week highs for MSFT, QCOM, and CSCO and then go back and look at the .0395 per share price for the 52 week high for ANDI.

By far, by a crazy huge enormous amount, one would have made more money by investing into ANDI versus investing into MSFT, QCOM, or CSCO. Please understand, I’m not saying that ANDI is a better stock that than MSFT, QCOM, or CSCO because it’s not. It’s not even close. It is not better than those major market stocks, but it was back then at their respective 52 week lows and even as of late.

So, 52 weeks ago…

Would you have taken the risk with MSFT, QCOM, or CSCO as your investment which has not even been close to a one bagger?

Or…

Would you have taken the risk with ANDI as your investment which was up to a 395 bagger?

With your logic and deductive reasoning, one would surmise that you would believe it to be better to buy MSFT, QCOM, or CSCO at their lows and be locked into the Laws of Diminishing Returns or minimal gains compared to instead, buying ANDI at .0001 per share where you could of seen an up to an 395 times higher the amount in your portfolio.

With my logic and deductive reasoning, which has come to fruition as a reality, it ”was not” better to buy MSFT, QCOM, or CSCO at their lows and be locked into the Laws of Diminishing Returns or minimal gains. It definitely would have been better to have bought ANDI at .0001 per share where you could have seen an up to an 395 times higher the amount in your portfolio.

In my opinion, there is no debate about such because the proof is in the results that has transformed into a reality to exist. The potential was captured. There is much more to debate about this, but let’s get to The $200 to $200,000 Transformation Process as I like to call it. There is much that I have explained that I hope will add even more clarity within the post below:

Exit Strategy & Etiquette Thoughts for a Stock
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128822531

v/r
Sterling