InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 642
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2013

Re: None

Wednesday, 01/31/2018 7:55:20 PM

Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:55:20 PM

Post# of 130887
I finally got the chance to see the really hilarious article on "Apple Insider".

Wow - seriously? This is silly, even by Tim Cook's "battery scheme and I thought I'd get away with it in Europe" standards.

The PTAB needs to give no explanation for a change of Justices, when it is revealed that the sitting Justices had previously REPRESENTED one of the parties. In any sane standard of practice, those Justices should have immediately recused themselves, and failed to do so. It was right and proper that they be removed. Nobody was swayed by "threats". I didn't see any "threats". I did, however, see gentle, literate and compelling reminders that our Judicial System should take a look at it's trajectory, and check themselves, lest they wander astray of the purpose of their position. How is that case-related exparte communications?

Silliness. All of it. Just a sad delay tactic. Embarrassing, really.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News