InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 67
Posts 1297
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2014

Re: None

Saturday, 01/27/2018 10:08:03 AM

Saturday, January 27, 2018 10:08:03 AM

Post# of 705302
1) Anyone who is still talking about speculated interim analysis futility halt recommendation today is just wasting his/her and others' time in this board as we have long passed that time point, and are looking forward to the disclose of how fat and long the the tail will be. Any long who has given anyone without shares but has repeatedly raised the old useless point like one above is pure [word omitted]!

2) Anyone who has disputed over where is the start of that 6 ~ 9 or so time frame for a publication per Linda Powers is also wasting time. The fact that Linda has canceled for three times of pre-scheduled appearances says it all. The publication will be significant, or as a material news and it will be seen anytime.

In a side note, anything from 2 to 12 months or so would be normal for someone to submit a manuscript to its actual publication, which is common sense and experience for anyone who have published some papers in first tier journals.

However, if a manuscript is of very significant content, novel in nature, that publication may be featured publication, and its publication will be fast tracked. I have seen some published in two months of time in whole, including submission, returned for revise from reviewers, and re-submission/publishing.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News