I believe institutional investors seek transparency first, growth prospects second, and fundamentals third.
Transparency comes in the form of audits and consistent open communication with the investment community built on press releases and general brand awareness promotion.
Growth prospects are considered by viewing expansion rate and general market acceptance and adoption of products and services offered.
Fundamentals are judged on financials.
All three of the above are in play for AMFE in the earliest of the most legitimate stages.
This is why institutional investment would consider AMFE as a long play.
I’ve said before, imagine being in an investment before institutional money pours in.
There are no guarantees that we’ll see that type of investment come in, but AMFE’s track record speaks for itself as they’ve fought their way off the pink sheets (actually in the final uplisting process), built a successful recognizable brand, slowly expanded using non toxic self funded methods, and communicated openly with investors for the better part of the last year and a half or so.
If the ingredients of a recipe call for pizza, it’s likely going to be a pizza, even if it doesn’t explicitly say it’s a recipe for pizza.
If the markings are there for institutional investment, money will likely come pouring in once we are uplisted and certain restrictions that disallow institutional investment in AMFE are lifted.
That’s your answer.
Long AMFE
Rec
