UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[Goodbuddy4863]

Super Important LINK for UOIP/CHANBOND.

Bookmark this link and check it daily & share on the board if you see any change:
https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/caselist?patent_owners=Chanbond+LLC

On above link, you will see 9 IPRs. One of these is for RPX (IPR2016-00234) which was denied on Jan 17th 2018. Check the sticky for RPX on the board. The other eight are for Cisco. Seven of these were not instituted and never appealed. Only one is pending i.e. IPR2016-01744on which an oral hearing was held on Nov. 2nd 2017. We all are waiting to see the progress on this one and need to keep track of its status:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=137839701


Here is some background History of CHanBond's Fight versus the Cable Companies and Cisco dating back to July 3rd, 2017:


RECENT RISE IN THE STOCK OF UOIP AND ITS RELATION TO CHANBOND
JULY 3, 2017 EPR FINANCIAL NEWS
Fairfax, VA, Jul-3-2017 - / EPR FINANCIAL NEWS / - Unified Online Inc. ( UOIP ) is an internet and cloud computing company. According to company materials, UOIP provides wireless and fiber broadband service, co-location space and related services. It operates a Network Access Point where customers directly interconnect with a network ecosystem of partners and customers.

The company was created after the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding stock of Computers and Tele-Comm., Inc., a Missouri corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, KC NAP, LLC in exchange for 23,921 shares of common stock. In 2013, UOIP announced that it would merge with Storage vendor ICE WEB. With this new business transaction, the company started providing cloud application services, and cloud storage services that include file sharing and collaboration services.

UOIP has a market cap of $ 11.33 million. In addition, through the Company's ICE-WEB Storage Corporation subsidiary, it can deliver cloud computing application services, other managed services, such as Disaster Recovery, Storage Archive, Redundant File Storage, Redundant Broadband Services and Business Continuity Services.

The company has not put any recent press, so the recent volatility is now quite noticeable. It is entirely possible that the company has not yet been closed, but that the company is in negotiations for a buyout, but both are speculative at best.

It currently has negative earnings. It has been volatile since the attack last month by several other cable companies. Could be responsible for pushing shares higher.

The Wannacry attack has been pushing up software companies across the market since the attack. The virus has not been updated and has not included a "critical" patch that had been "issued by Microsoft to remove an underlying vulnerability". Many organizations, which were not secured, suffered the attack that spread all over the world in the following days. Experts estimate that over 200,000 victims and more than 230,000 computers were infected. The virus did not slow down its activities until late May. Hackers asked $ 300 to $ 600 from each user to recover the encrypted files as ransom. UOIP might be riding this wave along with other sector companies, but it is unclear.

UOIP details intangible assets on the balance sheet; $ 5,049,383. Diving means that the total amount of assets is approximately $ 5.2 million. Intangible assets could be patented or technologies that are still widely developed. Above all this, UOIP is currently flagged by the OTC Markets exchange with the "Caveat Emptor" sign, which means that they need to "exercise additional care and perform diligent before making an investment decision in the company".

Unified Online Inc. (OTCMKTS: UOIP) is a volatile company with murky evidence behind the rise. Investors should be very careful about the company. Following the breadcrumbs leads us nowhere and UOIP could just be riding a temporary wave. This is a stock to watch but also a sector to keep an eye on.

On October 27, 2015, Unified Online (UOIP) Acquired 100% Chan-Bond, LLC (Chan-Bond), a portfolio of patents that discloses a technology that provides high-speed transmission data existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks.

Petitioner, RPX Corporation ("RPX"), US Patent No. 7,941,822 B2 (Ex. 1001, "the '822 Patent"). Paper 1 ("Pet."). Patent Owner, Chan-Bond LLC ("Chan-Bond"), filed on Preliminary Response on March 10, 2016. Paper 6 ("Prelim., Resp.").

The Broadband Group, Bright House Networks, Cable One, Cablevision, Communications, Communications, Charter Communications, Comcast Communications , Cox Communications, Mediacom Communications, RCN Telecom Services, Time Warner Cable, Wave Holdings Division, and Wide-open West Finance (District of Delaware Case Nos. 15-cv-842 to -854). Non-party Cisco filed eight IPR petitions against the three Chan-Bond patents in September 2016, and a stay was ordered on March 3, 2017 pending the PTAB's decisions to institute IPR.

Cisco's IPR petitions had mixed results. The patented claims of the claims in the US are made in the US Patent Application Serial No. 12,941,822 (IPR2016-01744), but denied institution of claims 13 and 14 in a second claim. IPR petition of the '822 patent (IPR2016-01746). (Note: RPX filed an IPR petition on claims 1-31 of the '822 which was instituted for trial and oral arguments were held in January 2017. A final written decision was made by the PTAB (see IPR2016-00234.) On March 29, 2017, six IPR petitions for US Patent Nos. 8,341,679 and 8,984,565 were denied institution.

The PTAB rejected Cisco's assertion that multiple channels are multiplexed on the same frequency bands, and that code channels or CDMA channels could be an RF channel within the meaning of the '679 patent. The panel cited an inconsistent statement by Cisco's expert which describes a FDMA and CDMA hybrid system using Walsh codes: "[t] he mutual orthogonally of Walsh codes allows one particular coded channel to be isolated and decoded from all other coded channels, even though they are all broadcasting on the RF channel. "(Italics added by the panel). The panel argues that this phrase refers to a particular frequency band as an "RF channel" and to divisions within the RF channel as "coded channels," and therefore gives weight to the expert's testimony regarding the meaning of "RF channel."

The PTAB concluded that the term "RF channel" as used in the '679 patent' does not include code channels - for example data streams created by CDMA- but instead refers to frequency bands, such as those created by FDMA. "(Final Written Decision of IPR2016-01898, p.13) All six of the IPR petitions of the '679 and' 565 patents were cited on the basis of the conclusion that Cisco's grounds were based on CDMA prior art.

IPRs has passed, so it will be interesting to see if a request for resolution is filed by Cisco to challenge the panel's decision. It is not clear if the interpretations are made by the panel will somehow pose issues for the future, and it is expected that it will be more widely accepted. 679 and 565 patents for now.

###

ATLANTIC BROADBAND GROUP BRIGHT HOUSE CABLEVISION ONE CABLEVISION CAVEAT EMPTOR CEQUEL COMMUNICATIONS CHANBOND COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMCAST COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTERS AND TELE-COMM. INC. COX COMMUNICATIONS ICE WEB KC NAP LLC MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS OTC MARKETS OTCMKTS: UOIP RCN TELECOM SERVICES RPX CORPORATION WARNER CABLE UNIFIED ONLINE INC. UOIP WAVE-DIVISION HOLDINGS
BUSINESS , FINANCIAL , FINANCIAL INFORMATION , FINANCIAL STATEMENTS , INVESTMENT , MONEY , STOCKS , TRADING
THE STORY OF CHANBOND'S FIGHT FOR ITS PATENT INFRINGEMENT
JUNE 14, 2017 EPR FINANCIAL NEWS
Fairfax, VA, Jun-14-2017 - / EPR FINANCIAL NEWS / - ChanBond is currently owned by UnifiedOnline ( UOIP ) and it is a legal fight with the 13 cable service providers in the country. The important point to understand is that Cisco describes its RF frequency use.

This means that the company is responsible for all the services that are used in the DOCSIS 3.0+ technology are infringing its patents. ChanBond took over the largest multi-system operators (MSOs) in the District Court of Delaware.

These companies use high speed data transmission of fiber-coaxial hybrid networks using a technology which comes under the patents of ChanBond. Cisco has already attempted to deny their claims by the ChanBond patents invalidated.

However, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rejected all six petitions from Cisco that asked for review of ChanBond's patents. PTAB officials indicated that they have failed to show that these patents are invalid. Here are the details of the patents under review.

Patent 8,341,679
This patent describes the use of an intelligent system that can distribute digital signals using a wideband signal distribution setup.

Patent 8,894,565
This article describes the details of the application and the insertion of the device. It also includes the rotating tubular member.

ChanBond Wins at PTAB
ChanBond has successfully won a response by PTAB when it declared that Cisco and other cable companies (RPX) have failed to show that they should be considered as redundant and invalid. The board clearly expresses its invalidity.

If we look at the history of this situation, we found that it was the most important companies in the world. They decided to challenge the current patents with the governing body of PTAB. However, their hopes are now severely dented since the board has been ruled in favor of ChanBond / UOIP. They now face an uphill battle in any legal setting since this decision is admissible in all courts of the United States.

It is important to understand that ChanBond now holds a key element in their short boxes. The current order provides a proposal for the parties to reach a settlement. A look at the official documents also revealed that the evidence presented in this paper was largely negative.

In fact, PTAB found these patents active, the current methods employed in the industry may be in violation of these patents since they employ their specific defined methods.

This is where we started in PTAB, which is started by ChanBond / UOIP.

Technical Details of the Case
There are several important details of the petition in which the patent was filed for 31 claims on November 20, 2015. The patent owner responded to the preliminary response on March 10, 2016. The RPX Corporate may have at least a single challenged claim, and proceeded further. ChanBond then filed its Patent Owner's Response which is a detailed response that describes the details of the patent and how it maintains its originality. RPX in turn, responded with a reply.

The oral hearing on this important issue occurred on January 30, 2017 and the hearing was also entered into the record. The Court of First Instance of the United States of America states that USC 102 (b) and 103 (a) are unpatentable to the laws.

The DOCSIS 1.1.4 was the main pillar of the claim presented by the cable companies. The concept of a digital stream of multiple coded RF signals was similar in its definition of terms.

The Court also observed in cases where multiple patents and conditions are under review, it is essential to follow the market practices in order to find relevance. Explicit analysis is essential in such cases, and this too, was the basis of resolving this particular dispute.

RPX suggests that the modern cable modems be followed by the national standard at the time of application of the ChanBond patents. However, ChanBond asserted that there is no such thing as a national standard in the field of digital transmission.

The court summarized that RPX as claimants had to bear the burden of proof. They failed to show that any skilled craftsman would have used the same technique as explained in the patents of ChanBond / UOIP. The process is presented in an attempt to establish a model for the use of the device and the set of devices described in the patents of ChanBond in a traditional manner. 37 CFR 90.2.

Effect on UOIP Stocks
Although it is difficult to predict the time of day, we find that it is necessary to enter a spiral. However, there are times when this does not happen, especially if the lawsuit is not known or not specified. Nevertheless, prior experience shows that the lawsuits are more often than not, produces a positive effect on stock prices.

UnifiedOnline (UOIP) stocks are going to be over the next few months. They have won this major case in PTAB, and they are now aggressively pushing the cable companies and Cisco to enter a mutual settlement worth millions of dollars.

The volume of sales of UOIP stocks has been clearly on the rise. Although we may observe some corrections, it is imperative to note that this will be a highly effective opportunity. This is because of the resolution of lawsuits in a positive way of reducing the fear factor among market investors and allowing them to be more liberal with the company stocks.

They are more eager to hold on to such stocks, which provide support to the company. As this particular lawsuit and legal position, the position of ChanBond / UOIP, it is natural to find that the stocks will keep rising up. UOIP will continue to perform positively and reach a better financial position in the next fiscal year.

UOIP Stocks will also be so, because there is a chance for an expensive settlement. This will provide ChanBond / UOIP with greater monetary resources. This means that they will further expand their operations and continue to excel in the near future.

Stay Long....be Strong.

Researched Here:
https://www.eprfinancialnews.com/


$$$$ UOIP $$$$
__________________________________________________

Ice2014 and KeepItRealistic contributed to this Message Body!!

Thank You....