InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,226.40
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.62
(
0.71%
)
Bitcoin
62,819.87
(
-0.54%
)
Post# of 214666
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

BullNBear52

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 132
Posts 201493
Boards Moderated 19
Alias Born 12/16/2002

BullNBear52

Member Level

Re: janice shell post# 86796

Friday, 01/19/2018 9:06:46 AM

Friday, January 19, 2018 9:06:46 AM

Post# of 214666
The DOJ/FBI still has to go back to the FISA court to have a warrant issued within a certain time frame.

I don't like the idea of warrentless wiretapping and the like. I personally don't see why it's necessary. It can be done without the names if the targets being made public.

And the issue with Flynn was not that he was being wiretapped but the Russian on the other end which is legal under FISA. Because of the nature of what was said on those calls Flynn's name was eventually unmasked.

The rest is history as his guilty plea indicates.

The republicans are barking up the wrong tree.

Simon Schama, the British historian, recently tweeted: “Indifference about the distinction between truth and lies is the precondition of fascism. When truth perishes so does freedom.”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up