im a survivor Aquisistions build revenues
If they are done right, Macro is a case in point. I do not see nor did I remember reading the PAVC Company would use Toxic Fianceing. That is one reason PAVC moved to a higher exchange to avoid this type of financeing IMO. PAVC is looking to move to a the Amer of NASD as was mentioned in a former PR.
Now the COMPANY did a R/S of the A/S. If they change the share structure they have to do a fileing update correct?
This is all IMO.
***************************************************************
I mentioned it.....I just think yall had me 'blocked out' at that time ;>)
<<No one commented on this - but the OS is now 26 million shares - NOT 300,000. At least that's what the 10K says.>>
Also, and this is just an opinion, but likely a very possible scenario......A much higher AS, that may grow very large.
Company has already stated they do not have the cash or conventional funding to sustain operations...that means only 1 thing....different forms of toxic financing...that much we do know as fact, as it is filed with the sec and they were very clear in what they said.....The fact is, the company has no choice but to use it's shares as currency....and to enter into other forms of dilutive, non-shareholder friendly, means of financing...and who knows what deals they may have already or be in the process of cutting with whoever......
Just my opinion, but one that was made clear and pretty obvious in their filings.......I read alot of filings so hard to keep up...wish I could remember which company I was reading in last couple of days...it had the normal ugly 'we may not make it' long, rambling, cover my butt, disclaimer as they all do....but like many that read 'almost' the same.....ugly, but....a key difference.....we have enough cash and conventionial funding available to sustain operations thru 2010 and believe we will be CFP by 3rd qtr 2007. It further said no dilution/toxic financing would be needed to sustain operations......it was your typical 'iffy', pos micro, but they did file and yes, alot of it, including all the disclaimers littered in every paragraph were ugly reading....stock still went up a good amount..if I could only remember which one it was...the point being...shareholder friendly.....cash and conventional funding...PAVC already stated they did not have cash or conventional funding to sustain operations and would have to rely on bla bla bla......and we all know that is the same thing as saying we will be printing shares and diluting several different ways......
Honestly, I wanted to ask Big Dog, since he seems to be the biggest " this is a guaranteed winner" pumper who wont wager on his opinion he thinks is 100% certain.....That if he..or anybody.....really feels good about this company, why the heck are you buying shares of stock? Via the filing...they NEED MONEY.....why pay the ask when you can cut a private and far more guranteed deal for .05 or less on the dollar??? I do it all the time.......troubled companies doing toxic financing is a huge draw to investors looking for easy money, that play in that arena.......get yourself some colatorized CCD's or whatever you feel comfy with....but when a company says they need cash and will have no choice but to do toxic financing, it is an invitation to many....and when you play that side, guess what? You will be one of the 'big boys' that the retail people bitch about everyday<lol>, although you dont need alot of money to move over to the dark side<g>, just knowledge in private funding in the micro arena and of course you can always move up and do PP's and etc with the real big boys, but that does take some cash to do......Frankly, that is where the real money is made in equities not by buying long or selling short or daytrading/flipping and etc.....If some of you want, possibly contact PAVC and see what kind of private deal you can work out....no reason to buy this stock if you like the company, when you can do a private deal for pennies on the dollar and guaranteed....the old saying...big boys always win...when you enter the correct type of 'private deal', even if you are not throwing down huge dollars, you are a 'big boy who will win'.......on the big boards you need a decent amount of cash and the type of deals are far different then the micros...but micros....you can get very creative and most companies in this arena really need the cash and are willing to do private deals for a fairly small amount of $$'s....
