InvestorsHub Logo

es1

Followers 153
Posts 16535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2009

es1

Re: rayovac812 post# 131026

Monday, 01/08/2018 1:08:38 PM

Monday, January 08, 2018 1:08:38 PM

Post# of 278408
Ray this is the confusion I suggested the board has.
I agree with your post but there are some things stated that do not make sense to me.
This is the situation as I see it. Maybe you can help me out...
We had a contract for shootpacks.

Shootpacks were delayed.

We sent fibers to test in the mean time.

Fibers were good enough to award more cash, but not quite the specs they want.

We begin creation of custom fibers.

DS sent to reelers.

That is where we stood till today.
Now the army awards more money.
We don't really know why.

So first question is...
If they want a fiber better than DS why would we continue production of shootpacks made with a fiber we know will not meet the standards?

IMO we wouldnt. But...

Kim stated they would ship the shootpacks in December.

So did we ship shootpacks or not?
And if not why?
Because they don't want them made of DS or because they don't have them complete?

If they don't want DS packs are we going to still make them if we can make the fiber they want?

Did the company supply them with an improved fiber to trigger the payment?

I have a feeling that the improvements and properties of the fiber they want will always remain confidential.
Do you think that with the contract expansion that Kim is now restricted on publishing contract information like dates and properties?

That is the only explaination I can see for not telling us the shootpacks shipped if they have.

We were told december. If we were to trust Kim we must assume they shipped. We may never hear about them again if Kim is bound by silence.
We may still hear a pass or fail from them after any testing is done.
But I would expect a fail if they requested a better performance already.







Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News