InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 94
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2012

Re: None

Wednesday, 01/03/2018 6:39:18 PM

Wednesday, January 03, 2018 6:39:18 PM

Post# of 727367
Question to the Judge:
Honorable Judge Mary F Walrath do you think that an examiner who tries to blackmail a certain outcome of your judgement by giving comments to the public even before the hearing, has any credibility?
By doing so he proves that he stands close to one party.
An examiner has to be absolutely neutral otherwise his conclusions are not objective.
I request to disregard any word coming from Mr.Joshua Hochberg.

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2010/11/04/2349/wamu-examiner-sheds-new-light-bankruptcy-criticizes-fdic-lack-cooperation


Statement of Mr Joshua Hochberg:
Lack of transparency by the FDIC, while a concern, did not affect his final conclusions.
How can he know that it would not effect his final conclusion.
(Mr Hochberg claims to be examinor and does not follow the basic laws of logic!)

FDIC holds back information, for what reason?
FDIC refused Bair and two other officials to be interviewed, for what reason?
Does FDIC shiver that malpractice or even corruption comes to the light?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News