InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,261.22
(
0.27%
)
Post# of 116863
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

bigdaddy21c

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 1411
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2011

bigdaddy21c

Re: tdbowieknife post# 111208

Wednesday, 01/03/2018 3:29:28 PM

Wednesday, January 03, 2018 3:29:28 PM

Post# of 116863
"That's in reference to the Ashe, 992 case, not the Treaty and gang of cons case."

Not true at all. Read it again closely and carefully. When the judge stated: the SEC “truly walked the razor's edge with their response, he was talking about the SEC's response to the Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment in the SEC case against Treaty and the Fab 5. The 1993 case of Ashe V. Corley wasn't a case the SEC was involved in.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up