InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 188
Posts 33680
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 04/14/2010

Re: dloggold post# 111203

Wednesday, 01/03/2018 8:09:18 AM

Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:09:18 AM

Post# of 116863
That's in reference to the Ashe, 992 case, not the Treaty and gang of cons case.

The Judge says about the gang of cons that they " failed to raise
any factual issues at all"


And from the SEC that the Judge excepted as fact... There only defence is "it did not happen" without anything to support that claim.

The substance of Defendants’ argument in support of their
motion for summary judgment begins on the last page of their
memorandum, after noting that they “will not belabor the issue.”
Defendants address the SEC’s claims in three paragraphs, each
essentially restating the claim and ending simply with the
phrase “That did not happen.” (Rec. Doc. 74-1, p. 25)

Rather than respond with evidence of specific facts
creating a genuine issue for trial, the SEC argues in opposition
that Defendants failed to meet their burden as movants because
they merely deny that the alleged violation occurred. (Rec. Doc.
82, p. 4) Furthermore, the SEC asks the Court to “disregard all
uncited allegations contained in Defendants’ brief and the
accompanying ‘Statement of Uncontested Facts,’ which are not
supported by a single citation to the evidence.”
(Rec. Doc. 82,
p. 2)


https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/louisiana/laedce/2:2015cv02451/167525/86/0.pdf?ts=1439463149






..





I expose stock scams to gain knowledge about investigating the stock market players and for the entertainment it invariably generates. I've received NO compensation in any form for such, except for a few thank yous...

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.