InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 35
Posts 3698
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2013

Re: 111222333 post# 27697

Wednesday, 12/20/2017 3:27:56 PM

Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:27:56 PM

Post# of 33030
The 2017 payments are areements to pay, not paid. This may be the 100m in dillution. The contingents are based on 3 factors, the earlier of which deems the contingency valid. Merger, financing, or acquisition of 1.25m... Why does it not say who the merger is with? Naming the other party, if they are out, would be misleading? right? If the merger was on, they would not need the other variables? right?
All I am saying is this PR looks pointless so why post it if the merger is legit and moving forward? I can not think of a good reason other than to prop the price up so selling can continue to pay those 2017 salaries... IMO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BTCS News