Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

Although, there can be no guarantees the risk versus reward on several levels to me is worth the wait

Agreed. If A2-73 is an effective treatment for these RETT kids then game over. Sure all the rest has to be done but the thesis on homeostasis is validated, at least partially. That is when the eruption starts and AVXL gets respect...IMO, that is when even BIIB has to step up and tell the REAL story on MS. Other trials will be underway and a positive bias is established...maybe we can expect positive trail results on AD after 99.6% failure rate. (if you grant current SOC is a pass).

We have been our own worst enemy, but, we came by it honestly. If risk is simply explained as uncertainty, a lack of knowledge and information, then we screw ourselves by being very private. On the other hand, if we are open about what we are learning then the AF of the world drive us out of business, all for a buck.

If risk and uncertainty are mitigated by learning, information and knowledge (my claim) then, IMO, the RETT trial/results may be pointed to in future science training as THE binary event. Not a small thing. In fact (I defer to Falcon and others) it does not. get any bigger.