a bluelight special
dude, was the headline " fair and balanced" like Fox News? Was the close of the article? i don't think so.
all the subheads are skewed too.
the five biggest PC tech concerns get together & abolish the TCPA, which necessarily abolished the UN veto structure. The UN accomplished nothing during the height of the Cold War b/c of the veto for perm. sec. counsel members. TCPA followed a similar structure & went nowhere ('cept the TPM specs).
TCG provides Softee no veto. Softee makes products that are bug-ridden & have vulnerabilities that allow stuff like "i love you San" & SoBIG.f... that same company is now going to develop profound security?!? Even if we assume it is true for arguendo, Softee is notoriously late w/releases & Longhorn is likely no exception (& given the scope of the release, it'll likely be even later). BTW, have you noticed what Softee says about SSCs?
you wrote: "...could have crushed Wave at a vulnerable time and sent investors and shareholders running for the exits."
that sure smells like agenda Blue. You, much like Patterson, imbued yer prose with words that foment doubt. Writers push agenda through the words they choose & all sorts of other devices.
i could go on & on & on about yer post...
just buy back yer shares @ the open & be done w/it!
whatever,
SPIN
