You say the article points out the good the bad and the ugly. What you don't say is that what little good is presented (there was plenty of stuff on the good side left out of the article), is presented with a 'look what they believe...can you believe it?' attitude.
Actually, I'd like you to point one single positive part of that article that wasn't offset by a semantic negative...
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. - Carl Sagan
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.