InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: paige post# 14653

Thursday, 09/28/2006 1:40:54 PM

Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:40:54 PM

Post# of 45771
Paige, the ASD invention was reduced to practice by at least one of the two methods, they disclosed all the embodiments in a US patent application. I say "at least" because I don't know if ASD also built functional prototypes of some or all embodiments of the invention to "actually" reduce the invention to practice.

Do you know whether they did or did not build a fuctional prototype? I bet they did (sorry Scared).

In either case, you're just spinning your wheels if you don't know for sure.

Reduction to Practice: The physical part of the inventive process that completes the process of invention.

Until there is a reduction of practice, there is no invention.

There are two kinds of reduction of practice:


Constructive reduction to practice occurs upon the filing of a U.S. patent application that adequately discloses the invention.

Constructive reduction to practice does not involve any physical construction.

Actual reduction to practice occurs when there is physical verification that the invention works for the intended purpose.

The reduction to practice must involve each and every element that is defined as constituting the invention.

The degree of physical verification required will depend on the nature and complexity of the invention.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.