InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1423
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: nyt post# 43538

Friday, 11/24/2017 10:43:01 AM

Friday, November 24, 2017 10:43:01 AM

Post# of 130795
NYT - Over the last 4 years that I've been in this stock, a lot of people on this board give you a lot of crap or try to beat you down because you're thinking differently than most here. Your reasoning seems sound and logical. I completely understand how excitement from drinking the VPLM Kool-Aid can go from sweet to sour over time...I've been in the same boat and have vacillated back and forth between being the eternal optimist, then sink to being a deep pessimist, only to be rebound back to the optimistic view when good news breaks.

That said, I'm a long with a very sizable position and continue to hope for the best possible outcome for all stakeholders in the company. One thing that doesn't make sense to me is this. If VPLM doesn't have the goods or the patents aren't worth anything nor have any value, why would Knobbe Martens, arguably the best IP law firm in the country, stake their reputation on this fight? I know firms are motivated for many reasons but this is one thing I just can't wrap my head around since KM agreed to represent VPLM. Looking for your insight...what are your thoughts?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News