InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 2522
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2001

Re: SPIN post# 7638

Tuesday, 08/26/2003 9:08:17 AM

Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:08:17 AM

Post# of 249169
SPIN: Before you purport to demonstrate how simple it would be to reduce to writing on April 30 a complex deal that closed on April 30, you should put yourself in the shoes of the guy who was writing on April 30.

You say I could do it so why couldn't they. Why? Because I was writing in August and they were writing in April.

For example, there were alternate modes of establishing the "effectiveness date" from which the second 90-day segment would run. July 29 did not become the effectiveness date until July 29. You could not have written on April 30 that the closings above $1.90 would begin to count on November XX because the contingencies might have resolved in a way that established a significantly earlier timeline.

I'm not saying that the confounding language is good. I'm just being realistic about the costs of making it better. People place a higher premium on timely functionality than they do on esthetic clarity.

Best wishes,
John





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.