InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 293
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/31/2004

Re: matrix post# 219511

Tuesday, 09/26/2006 9:27:29 PM

Tuesday, September 26, 2006 9:27:29 PM

Post# of 358501
Okay, that's interesting. Are the accounts still frozen? Was money-laundering alleged?

The thing that caught my attention about this was that the NASD was so upset about a SAR violation. Filing a SAR is a judgment call. If there was no money-laundering, then NevWest made the right call. If not, then that should have been (or should eventually be) specified. The SAR violation liability is in there to give the NASD a catch-all to go after B/D's when they can't determine and they'll never be able to determine whether a crime was committed (which sometimes happens with funding of terrorist organizations) or when the B/D was privy to a crime (which sometimes happens with securities fraud).

One of the other claims was "failure to supervise". This is what nails most B/D's when something goes wrong. The NASD may not be able to prove the heavy-duty stuff, but they can usually prove "failure to supervise".
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.