InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,064.20
(
0.91%
)
US TECH 100
17,178.00
(
1.88%
)
Dow Jones
38,225.66
(
0.85%
)
Brent Oil
83.84
(
0.25%
)
Bitcoin
59,600.72
(
0.81%
)
Post# of 96901
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Scruffer

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 21
Posts 2302
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/19/2017

Scruffer

Re: Nickelback post# 37790

Thursday, 10/19/2017 8:53:07 AM

Thursday, October 19, 2017 8:53:07 AM

Post# of 96901
Conclusive evidence keeps piling-up on Cisco's violations.

Great details relevant and applicable in ChanBond's lawsuit. Thank you.

-- Technology was invalid was no defense.

-- I thought it was legal.

-- Invalidity is not a defense to infringement, it is a defense to liability

Induced infringement:

-- Knowledge of the patent in suit = CHECK (yes)
-- Knowledge of patent infringement = DOUBLE CHECK (yes)

https://www.law360.com/articles/493946/synqor-cisco-settle-suit-over-patent-infringement

Someday we should (hopefully) win.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up