InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 762
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

Re: jaykayjones post# 41821

Saturday, 08/23/2003 4:21:46 PM

Saturday, August 23, 2003 4:21:46 PM

Post# of 432969
I don't know why anyone believed this:

"Ziploc; this is a good issue to explore. In addition, because of the 1999 agreement, there's always been the presumption (by me included) that NOK and IDCC had/has a great relationship and that NOK accepted all IDCC's IPR."

I have been pointing out for over two years that the Nokia/IDCC agreement didn't mean squat, that it was all a ruse for appearances sake since a royalty rate was not defined. That was without a doubt and yet most IDCC longs continued to ridicule me as if I didn't know what I was talking about.

The lesson here is that if there is no rational ammunition on one side of the argument, that argument is a fallacy designed to deceive.

Once

The best way to convince a fool that he is wrong is to let him have his own way.

~ ~ ~ Josh Billings

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News