InvestorsHub Logo

F2

Followers 50
Posts 2470
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2010

F2

Member Level

Re: Fullbirt22 post# 30756

Monday, 10/16/2017 8:21:51 AM

Monday, October 16, 2017 8:21:51 AM

Post# of 195440
Normally, I would agree Full... the main difference here being tactics employed by shorts. I think that is the obvious difference. There has never been a reasonable dialogue about the stocks value. There has been a practice of smearing the company as 'scammy', for attacking the funding source and maligning character of leadership.

I would that we never had reasonable dialogue about the science, company value, the likelihood that the company will succeed or fail.

But at the end of the day shorts have made their bet to the tune of about a million shares. This on the board here to the tune of many in favor of the company's development and disruptive possibility in the technology field. If I were playing poker, I would love my hand. The longs have done a LOT more due diligence than the shorts.

In my opinion only, they looked at company history and failure of polymers in the past and the unlikely event that this company would ever 'make it'. Let's face it, something like 98-99% of the time companies on the OTC.BB don't. So while I get it, they have history, history and history on their side, we have a novel approach, patents and progress and now Dr. Michael Lebby as CEO.

We are set for a massive showdown come the next weeks and months. When I step back away from my investment it is a fascinating showdown. When I see the shorts tactics, it gets personal because of the tactics used.

Best to the longs,

F2

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News