Thursday, October 12, 2017 10:45:01 AM
Someone said Cool Tech. got good news from the judge that told it was these folks, last shot. File a letter, not more than 3 pages that shows the factual bases of why judge should not grant companies motion to dismiss. Why, because what they filed has no basis of Facts while the company, in its motion to dismiss showed, Cool Tech did issue stock and warrants, they did file the S-1 registration and the accusing parties could have sold shares at close to $2 a share and made over 200% percent profit under Rule 144. Hence, this renderes their suit to a pile of rubble.
My posts should not be construed as investment advice. These comments are for discussion purposes only.
Recent WARM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2023 03:45:48 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2023 09:56:45 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/01/2023 05:27:52 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/21/2023 04:14:42 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM