InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: ziploc_1 post# 115450

Wednesday, 10/04/2017 6:39:01 AM

Wednesday, October 04, 2017 6:39:01 AM

Post# of 426451
z-

Safety: nobody questioned the safety of V ... but safety (alone) isn't enough, efficacy should be proved also

SPA: They have the right to "cancel" in case of lack of enough evidence ("substantial scientific issue essential to determining the ... effectiveness") which is the case here ... TG reduction isn't a substantial scientific issue.

TG: Meanwhile, Anchor showed that Vascepa lowered triglycerides, which is a good thing, not a bad thing, it is unknown (YTD) that TG reduction will be resulted in event reduction or not. No study (inc. JELIS with 5% TG reduction ...!) proved the theory ... all study (about add-on therapy as matter and related) failed to prove the hypothesis ... and maybe R-IT won't prove it either (just like JELIS) ... FDA did not say anything about EPA / V ... they moved based on TG lowering / add-on science.

The bipolarity on the board is interesting: V isn't about TG lowering, more than TG lowering (e.g. inflammation) on one hand, but should be approved based on TG lowering on the other hand ...

Best,
G

#NEWMIAMI

Disclosure:
I am long with this stock. I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Do Your Job

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News