InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2017

Re: None

Wednesday, 09/27/2017 9:38:33 PM

Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:38:33 PM

Post# of 21990
Case Judge intends common shareholders of SOUPQ/SOUP to benefit from her decision.
That stockholders would benefit from the settlement was a major point that WealthColony / Gallant agreed to in order to get approval for the purchase of Soupman Inc.
Stockholder's being included was a main reason for her not signing the original agreement, and sending everyone back to meeting and find a settlement that among other things would be beneficial to shareholders...
If stockholders in SOUP/SOUPQ are not benefited from the Soupman Inc. settlement, this is worth contesting if the stockholders so will. The sooner the better if the agreed upon inclusion of common shares in this settlement is not honored.
Bankruptcies are an ongoing process.
Any WealthColony / Gallant outcome of Soupman Inc. exiting this Chapter 11 debt restructuring still must be approved by the Chapter 11 Judge on this case.
Perhaps interested investors will write the Judge soon if their common SOUP/SOUPQ shares do not provide them a beneficial outcome from the settlement.
If the Judge hears nothing from stockholders, she will think you do not care. You will be considered to be..."Not really interested if your shares become valueless?"
If a person in authority hears from someone suffering from process - the authority often will consider their cause.
No decision is final until after a cooling off period.
Challenges could be filed if necessary.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.