I decided to answer your post sentence by sentence:
<<Think about the technology and all our products that are using it: web, ads, links, crm, tv, live and youtube interactive.>>
yes huge markets are being addressed, but so far none are paying us anything significant that we know of
<<I call this kind of technology as no-brainer tech, because it is so easy to see its benefits.>>
I don't know why the huge markets don't seem agree with that statement by putting big dollars into it. That is my concern. Someone is right and IMO it is always the market and not the company or us.
<<It enhances currently existing and widely adopted product (video) without any notable opportunity costs. For companies and those individuals that create videos to make money, there's simply no reason not to make your videos interactive, when it's as easy and affordable as with notifi technology. >>
And yet, this isn't being done. Maybe it isn't easy. Maybe CRM salespeople find making a phone call or email or even an in person stop-by to be much easier and effective. Or maybe MLM find that parties at houses and conventions are far more successful.
With regard to companies that already have video - I agree with you - that it seems like a no brainer. So where are the companies chomping at the bit? Is it POSSIBLE that the only real interactivity 99% of those companies need is a link - which is already being done? Is it possible that the phone throw out, the surveys, the video in a video, and the immediate download just have limited appeal for 99% of those companies? I don't know that answer. I just know that I thought THAT market would have taken hold many months ago - and it still hasn't. Why?
There is a reason that what looks like opportunity with not much cost to us isn't being jumped on by the market being addressed. Yes there was continued development but which development were people clamoring for? We don't know. I have to conclude that market resistance to adoption has been because it has NOT been easy enough for them to do, OR they have NOT seen the results the wanted from it in testing, OR they simply are resistant to change. NONE of those are qualities of a 'hot' product though. That is my point. If it is going to 'blow up' and get hot, we are going by what we are being told and nothing we are actually able to see for ourselves at this point.
<<Normally in this kind of situation the challenge would be to pick the company/companies that are the winners of this new tech. And this is why I think nFusz is such an amazing investment opportunity, because at the moment there really isn't anything that compares to our tech and products.>>
See above answer - primarily with CRM in mind. With regard to ITV I feel differently. I feel that the demand is there for that. But ITV isn't new. What if someone else with deep pockets is working on the same kind of tech? - I think of Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and Amazon - surely all of those companies see potential with clicking and buying on video/movies/tv. So I like it, but I do have concerns.
<<No doubt we will get some real competition at some point, but before that we have already taken a nice piece of the market to ourselves. >>
Potential. Hope. But the reality is not yet validating either of these. That's my entire point. We get excited time after time but where are the big paying customers? Always around the next corner. I continue to have faith and hope, but I would be lying if I said I have no doubts or concerns to counter all of them.
I'm still here and THIS IS THE TIME. THIS IS THE CRITICAL TIME for this company. I don't think anybody will disagree with that statement. We thought it was a year ago but were wrong. We aren't wrong now. It's PROVE IT time.
AI
